From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
NativeForeigner
Talk /
Contribs
02:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
reply
GA review (see
here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written .
a (prose) : b (
MoS for
lead ,
layout ,
word choice ,
fiction , and
lists ) :
Generally good prose. A couple instances of awkward speech, fixed those.
It is factually accurate and
verifiable .
a (references) : b (citations to
reliable sources ) : c (
OR ) :
Battery of well formatted reliable sources.
It is broad in its coverage .
a (major aspects) : b (focused) :
Very excellent work here again.
It follows the
neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by
images , where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales ) : b (appropriate use with
suitable captions ) :
Cropped one of the maps
Overall :
Pass/Fail :
Well written article. Unequivocally passes GA criteria, but additional images, and improvement of prose would be required for FA. Also think expansion would be required.