This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Richmond article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 30, 2014 and August 30, 2017. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've removed the reenactment image ( File:Battle of Richmond Kentucky.jpg). It's obviously not a depiction of the real battle, it showed a Confederate national flag with the wrong number of stars (by 1862 it should have had 13, not 7), and it wasn't a very good photo in the first place, with far too much sky. The sepia coloring may make it look at a casual glance as if it was a period photo of the real battle, actually giving a wrong impression. Huon ( talk) 02:13, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
put the image back youd have to be a idiot to think it was period. it even said reenactment on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bj howard ( talk • contribs) 02:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
I have requested citations for a part of the background section which seems to contradict the sourced statements in the "Kentucky in the civil war" article. Also the last assertion in the section is so vague as to be effectively unusable. 75.170.153.19 ( talk) 22:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
@ Howcheng: You just removed the 'expansion section' tag from an empty section. How is it justified? Thanks. -- Mhhossein talk 17:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Richmond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)