From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Argento Surfer (
talk ·
contribs )
18:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
All of my comments are open for discussion. Once complete, I'll claim this review for points in the 2018 wikicup.
Argento Surfer (
talk )
18:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
Is it well written ?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
These are my copyedits. Feel free to revert, revise, or discuss any of them.
B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation :
no concern
Is it
verifiable with no original research ?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline :
no concern
B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources , including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged , and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines :
no concern
C. It contains
no original research :
no concern
D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism :
no concern
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
"The direction ... changed when Pandemic learned that the game had to be based on the film" - Is there more detail available on this? It seems to contradict earlier statements. What did Pandemic think they were making, a generic Batman game? A "loosely inspired" one? If nothing more is available, I recommend removing this sentence. It isn't vital to the paragraph, and as-is it's more teasing than informative.
I've removed it. The Unseen64 video says it happened after they got concept art of the Joker but doesn't say if that's what made it change.
JOE
BRO
64
11:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
Works for me.
Argento Surfer (
talk )
17:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ):
no concern
Is it
neutral ?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
no concern
Is it stable ?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
no concern
Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images ?
A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status , and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content :
n/a
B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions :
n/a
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
One request for additional information under 3A. Otherwise everything looks great.
Argento Surfer (
talk )
20:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
Responded above. Thanks for reviewing.
JOE
BRO
64
11:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
@
Argento Surfer : whoops, forgot to ping.
JOE
BRO
64
11:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
reply
Looks good to me. Happy to promote this one.
Argento Surfer (
talk )
17:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
reply