This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Basuki Tjahaja Purnama from the Indonesian Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
An image used in this article,
File:BasukiTP.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:BasukiTP.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 10:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC) |
This "blasphemy case" has been trending in the news, and a lot of readers are coming to Wikipedia for background as a consequence.
Unfortunately, that section of this article is very poorly written (both language and content) and provides no background at all. What has Basuki actually said? What is in that "Al Maidah verse 51". What is the connection? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.4.129.73 ( talk) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The editing content was correct. Yet I entered the written reason in Indonesian language. Please bear with me. Thank you. Marxolang ( talk) 06:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The section Ethnic and Religious Issues of this article is riddled with inaccuracies, poorly constructed sentences, and contains a large number of very personal opinions about Purnama that don't come close to neutrality.
It is a serious issue as he is facing a blasphemy charge and the entire section Ethnic and Religious Issues appears to have been written by someone with an axe to grind against him. There is no objectivity in the statements contained in this section.
The section should be removed as it expresses only a purely personal bias against Purnama. This is not the quality of content that should be expected.
Izumojin ( talk) 10:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Just saying. 2A02:1810:4D34:DC00:C94A:AC7:B0B5:D854 ( talk) 08:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Before this becomes an edit war.
@ Gadjah Mada: you stated “obviously”. While I personally agree, can you point to a RS that explicitly described the blasphemy accusations as fabricated? AFAIK, the Supreme Court denied his lawsuit on this topic exactly. [1] Juxlos ( talk) 09:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Done. Gadjah Mada ( talk) 11:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
References
How is this a WP:POV photo? Is it because the photo "make it look like the demonstration was much more peaceful than actually was"? If I google image search "aksi 212" for example, most of the photos that come up show the aerial images of a non-violent demonstration. Are they all POV photos as well, because it does not zoom into a random angry bearded guy with an Islamic hat or turban? @ Davidelit JahlilMA ( talk) 06:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:BRD, coming here to discuss with Davidelit and anyone else interested. My reason for removing this material is simply that it is irrelevant to the page - it is just grandstanding by a social media figure. Tawhidi is not a theologian and is mostly known for courting controversy on Twitter. Why are his actions or views relevant? It is not discrimination based on nationality, nor does the presence of two reliable sources really make a difference. It is a question of due and undue weight. Giving space to irrelevance like this worsens the article. Ganesha811 ( talk) 12:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)