From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
AirshipJungleman29 (
talk ·
contribs )
23:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
I will take this review.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk )
23:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Is it well written ?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Many minor grammar, spelling, punctutation mistakes.
B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation :
The lead is too short, failing to give a clear overview of the entirety of the article. The layout incorporates multiple single-sentence paragraphs and short sections.
Is it
verifiable with no original research ?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline :
B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources , including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged , and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines :
The excessive reliance on newspaper clippings is not encouraging. I would suggest using the books in the references section instead.
C. It contains
no original research :
Several notes contain original research. The paragraph beginning "It seems that Watson's family..." is total OR. The education section is unsourced
D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism :
Several lengthy quotes from
this website means that the article fails the copyright violation guidelines.
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ):
Is it
neutral ?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable ?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images ?
A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status , and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content :
B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions :
Most of the gallery pictures do not "illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images" (
WP:GALLERY )
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
I am putting this article on hold, and giving the nominator a period of time to execute the significant changes needed.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk )
00:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
I am failing this GAR for lack of improvement. I hope you will consider actioning them in the future.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk )
13:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.