Notice of obsolescence: Community sanctions in this area of conflict have been revoked or have expired. As a result, this community sanctions-related page is now obsolete, is retained only for historical reference, and should not be modified. For the specific community decision that rescinded or modified these community sanctions, see
this discussion at the administrators' noticeboard.
Sanctions imposed may include restrictions on
reverts or other specified behaviors,
bans from editing the Obama pages and/or closely related topics,
blocks of up to 1 year in length, or any other measures the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
For the purpose of imposing sanctions under this provision, an administrator will be considered "uninvolved" if he or she is not engaged in a current, direct, personal conflict on the topic with the user receiving sanctions (note: enforcing this provision will not be considered to be participation in a dispute).
Administrators are not to reverse such sanctions without either (1) approval by the imposing administrator, or without (2) community
consensus or Committee approval to do so.
Posting here from the RfAr case so as notify to the editors/admins involving with the current article probation, allowing for the review to begin :
The probation on articles relating to Barack Obama will be reviewed by a group of involved and non-involved editors and administrators to see how effective it has been. The process will last two weeks. After the two weeks elapse, the working group will provide their findings to us and the community, and will outline how the article probation will run in the future (i.e. what are the terms of article probation, what constitutes being involved and therefore required to be under it, etc.)-
Mailer Diablo16:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)reply