![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I do not agree with this paragraph:
"One of the primary obstacles that the Bank will face will be the reconciliation of its stance against American influence and Brazil's good economic and political relationship with the USA. Brazil is the largest and one of the most influential economies in Latin America."
Brazil has not good relations with the USA, just remember the case with the visas.
The main obstacle with Brazil is if Brazil will try to play as a dominate nation or if it will accept consensus based decision (as for example the European Union or the OECD).
While researching sources for another article, I've discovered that this article is unbalanced and POV, failing to mention the significant amount of reliably sourced criticism and controversy surrounding Banco del Sur. The following need to be incorporated:
This article is based almost entirely on less than reliable or leftist sources, and includes no mention of the controversy and concerns raised by reliable mainstream or financial sources. Please balance. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 07:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
The bank was founded before the big financial crisis hit the world which was a few days after the 2008 Bejing Olympics. In these now vastly changed circumstances the BancoSur countries appear to have fared somewhat better than other countries. Usually, Chavez is bagged in the English speaking world. But like all individuals who head a country and have a strong profile, they are only extras on the world stage, like the late Shah of Iran, Saddam Hussein, even Stalin and Mao. Let's not take the individuals too seriously. So far, the BancoSur seems to have had a positive influence on the people where it operates - we do not get reports on mass unemployment like from Spain for instance. So - the above links are only interesting for those who have missed the beginning in 2007. 144.136.192.59 ( talk) 00:59, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Why is this article named Bank of the South, when the bank name is Banco del Sur? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 06:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, and is the term South Bank regularly used as an alternative name to refer to this organisation? If so where, and by who? Stuffed cat ( talk) 19:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Why is the Dutch name at the front of the article? Is Suriname a member? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.151.113 ( talk) 17:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
This article lacks any information on what has happened since 2009. Or - if nothing much has changed - on why not. Perhaps someone with the relevant knowledge and references could provide an update?
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bank of the South. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)