This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Civil engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Dams Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brazil: Geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Geography of Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance). Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article gives the power produced at 250MW, presumably because in the first reference, five turbines with a capacity of 50MW are acknowledged. However, dams NEVER actually produce their maximum level of electricity, so this figure is obviously wrong. The second reference, an abstract from a research paper, states that the electricity produced is 112MW. This sounds far more reasonable to me. Should this figure, 250MW, be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.50.219 ( talk) 10:14, 26 October 2011 (UTC) reply

I adjust the wording for installed capacity which is most often cited. Thanks for the catch.-- NortyNort (Holla) 14:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC) reply