This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
plants and
botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve
Baccharis articulata, or
sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our
to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
I think you need better evidence than that. EOL is a project led by the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History. Where is the evidence that Wikipedia's authority and reliability transcends theirs?
Plantsurfer00:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Plantsurfer: you do have a point it is run by the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History, which is reliable. However, the Wikipedia page on
Encyclopedia of Life states it is It is compiled from existing databases and from contributions by experts and non-experts. Maybe we might have to discuss this with biology wiki projects.
CycoMa (
talk)
00:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Also there site says this Today, the Encyclopedia of Life is expanding to become a global community of collaborators and contributors serving the general public, enthusiastic amateurs, educators, students and professional scientists from around the world. What do you think about?
CycoMa (
talk)
01:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Sounds a bit like Wikipedia then, but with more professional involvement and support. What is not to like? To reject it as a source we would need to have factual evidence of significant errors, inconsistency, misinformation, etc., not value judgements.
Plantsurfer11:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)reply