This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Babri Masjid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 183 days
![]() |
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
India,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 6, 2004. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
This page has archives. Sections older than 183 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Since the report by ASI confirmed that there existed a Hindu structure beneath the Babri Masjid and the findings upheld by Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court, shouldn't the phrase "many Hindus believe was built upon the site of Ram janmabhoomi, the hypothesized birthplace of Rama" in the opening paragraph (and other such instances elsewhere in the article) be modified to remove the words "many Hindus believe"? The belief is only restricted to the actual existence of Rama, the existence of a temple at that place is a fact and should not be debatable. 103.220.30.110 ( talk) 13:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Second, the ASI's basic findings (which are generally accepted, I believe) are that there is evidence of a Hindu structure beneath the mosque. I took that as you accepting there was a temple, my apologies for misintepreting you. Would you mind reverting Wikidrifterr's recent additions to the lead, which basically uncrticially repeat the Hindu temple claim as fact? Hemiauchenia ( talk) 21:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Successor-Masjid Mohammad bin abdullah link- /info/en/?search=Mohammed_Bin_Abdullah_Masjid
Edit the successor of the site. Kkllnnmm ( talk) 11:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, but the reason why supreme court of India gave this decision isn't clear !!! No, brief about the evidence found & archeological remarks on that disputed site. Please, add some clarification. This, article seems incomplete giving a sense of judgement instead pf putting the views of both the parties. 111.223.1.116 ( talk) 17:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Masid k niche jo ram ke murti mile hai wo court ki dekh rekh m khudai huyi hai iska koi evidence hai court k pass 2409:40E3:100C:B9D:24F0:B1A5:B355:AE82 ( talk) 03:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi please use another word here, activist is not a word that should be used here. That was invasive, offensive action violating the worship place of another religious group and resulted in most number of deaths of the group that was attacked. The word “extremist” seems more appropriate.
// On 6 December 1992, a large group of Hindu activists belonging to the Vishva Hindu Parishadand allied organisations demolished the mosque, triggering riots all over the Indian subcontinent, resulting in the death of around 2,000–3,000 people. // 2001:14BB:AA:917B:5447:181B:56CE:646F ( talk) 22:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
I will take a look at Tiefenthaler's original work when I have some time but does he provide descriptions about the inscriptions of any other site? Fwiw, neither is Kunal a trained historian nor is Prabhat Prakashan a reputed publisher. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, etc. Fyi, @ Vanamonde93 and Kautilya3. TrangaBellam ( talk) 15:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Map 22; Maps [50, 70, 189, 194, 282]; Map 71; Map 179 - Check all. TrangaBellam ( talk) 02:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
please use correct Indian map... You are using Indian map which is incomplete and wrong 106.205.185.128 ( talk) 14:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)