This article was nominated for deletion on August 1, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Constructed languages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

51,100 hits on Google. Koro Neil ( talk) 13:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC) reply

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amoore96, Laorfila, Miakalo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 15:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC) reply

In the example sentence

[Babm:] V pajio ci htaj, lrid cga coig pegayx pe bamb ak cop pbagt.

[English:] I am reading this book, which is very interestingly written in Babm by a predominant scholar.

quoted from Okrent, is "predominant" actually intended? If (as I suspect) "prominent" was actually intended, was the error Okamoto's, Okrent's, or the Wikipedian's? -- Haruo ( talk) 16:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC) reply

The error is in the original by Okomato, who also in the same sentence refers to the language as bamb not babm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soggy Wombat ( talk • contribs) 07:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC) reply

If the letters used represent syllables instead of sounds, shouldn't all the letters be capitalized? UseGodsStandards ( talk) 11:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC) reply