This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for
GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : *
Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) *
Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize
Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. *
Sport in the United Kingdom - the
Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the
discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
The segment about Lance Armstrong looks peculiar and malicious. I edited out parts that seemed like vandalism (I checked the Livestrong Foundation's page and OJ Simpson isn't part of it). I don't know enough about the topic to edit more. ~Reedcharles.
In 'Media coverage of scandal', I noticed bits such as this: "... Victor Conte. He was aspiring musician (and hippie, and alleged drug dealer), but those dreams were quickly dashed..."
This seems ungrammatical, and contains the unreferenced statement that Conte is an alleged drug dealer (or aspired to become a hippie musician who allegedly deals drugs?)
Also of interest is this block:
"From there, the book goes on to name the many athletes who received the drugs, and the writers go into great detail describing their thoughts on Barry Bonds. They believed that Bonds was a superior athlete, but was jealous of all the attention that Mark McGwire received in his record-breaking season of 1998. Bonds was jealous, they hypothesized, because McGwire was a suspected "juicer" and the Giants’ slugger wanted to prove that he could compete on a level equal to or exceeding that of McGwire."
The first piece seems to be irrelevant/malicious. The second seems similar, and contains unsubstantiated speculation. The writing style of the whole section seems strange and out of place. Combined with the lack of sources, this suggests it may have been written by/for someone with personal interests in the events.
I'm not a regular editor so I don't know if this is actually a policy violation, but it strikes me as something not consistent with general Wikipedia standards. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
196.210.11.120 (
talk)
21:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)reply