From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Blue Pumpkin Pie (
talk ·
contribs)
14:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
reply
-
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section):
b (citations to
reliable sources):
c (
OR):
d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- Who is Michael P Williams. I see he wrote books in the past but I don't know if he's credibly or note-worthy. He's the only source I'm not sure about.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects):
b (
focused):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I'll be reviewing this article. This one shouldn't take long.
Blue Pumpkin Pie (
talk)
14:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
reply
The source is more uplifted through the publisher, Boss Fight Books, rather than Williams himself. Basically as though he wrote for IGN or Polygon. -
Bryn
(talk)
(contributions)
09:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Here is some clarifying information about BFB:
[1] -
Bryn
(talk)
(contributions)
09:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Ok. in that case, it does seem like a note-worthy mention. I'll give it a pass now.
Blue Pumpkin Pie (
talk)
20:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
reply