This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of
Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about
Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline
How to write about settlements.
At
WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the
policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly
civility and
consensus building. We are aware that the wording on
Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see
WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as
Constitutional status of Cornwall,
Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Should the references to awen as defined by an online roleplaying group be transferred to a subsection for "popular culture" or removed entirely?
Adamsargant (
talk)
10:35, 17 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete on sight. This article needs some attention from someone who has written more than one research paper before. If I ever have time, I'll try to look at it, but not now and not very soon...
RhysDdu (
talk)
11:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)reply
A few questions
I'm concerned about the section on Neo-Druidism, where it suggests that the symbol /|\ was 'invented by Iolo Morganwg'... to my knowledge, Mr. Morganwg had merely compiled the beliefs of Welsh bards and so his work may have been only the first documentation of a much older belief. Is there another source which suggests that the symbol has no historical antecedent to support the statement that Iolo invented it? (also, for the record, I'm pretty sceptical about the interpretation of /|\ to mean Awen, when Iolo's compendium, the Barddas, clearly indicates the symbol to mean the three letter 'name' of God, OIU/OIW, who would be the source both of Awen and all the welsh letters)
polygraphic 14:49, 30 Sept 2010
I don't understand parts of this article. I had to hit 'edit this page' to find out who/what the unnamed source was. ("A source notes that [ ... ] The same source also describes...") I think that could be a lot clearer. Is there a reason for not saying the British Druid Order rather than "a source"? And what is the culture in which Awen is a female name? Welsh culture, or Druid culture? It's not at all clear. --
Telsa 23:28, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I would like to see some documentation that the Awen emblem is anything more than a modern logo for the British Druid Order. I feel the picture should be removed or at least clearly labeled as a modern invention- should such documentation not be forthcoming. --
Magbhitu
All the second half of this article, including the emblem, is modern "druidic" nonsense and has no place in an article on an important and academically valid part of early medieval Welsh culture (the Awen - a feminine noun, by the way - is central to Welsh poetic tradition). This needs some serious rewriting. The purveyors of "Celtic Mist" have struck once again!
Enaidmawr22:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)reply
I'd like to see some solid references to the origin of the symbol, as well. However, the 'second half' of the article should not be classified as nonsense. If it has a present-day use, it merits an entry, and I can't see anyone being served by splitting the article. --
John T. Folden08:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Perhaps there should be a reference to the equivalent concept in Germanic thought, "Wod"... the two concepts are pretty much identical, and the Kelts and Germanics are closely related and had much interaction and influence on each other over the millennia.
Aelswyth217:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Aelswythreply
A reference to the Irish "imbas" would also seem obvious. 7 January 2008.
I have seen the english translations, as well as the latin and I have yet to verify the claim that "The first recorded attestation of the word occurs in Nennius' Historia Brittonum", in fact I cannot find the word Awen or Inspiration anywhere in the English translation. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.155.185.195 (
talk)
14:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The Latin text from Wikisource reads
62 Tunc Dutigirn in illo tempore fortiter dimicabat contra gentem Anglorum. tunc Talhaern Tataguen in poemate claruit et Neirin, et Taliessin, et Bluchbard, et Cian, qui vocatur Guenith Guaut, simul uno tempore in poemate Britannico claruerunt.
The words in bold give Talhaern's name tag in Old welsh 'Tataguen' (Father of the Awen) though some English translations would give 'muse' instead of 'awen'
Crychydd (
talk)
12:49, 26 April 2022 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Awen. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
NAn editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.