This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Autoradiograph article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Amp1104.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 15:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Could someone explain the difference between macro and micro autoradiography. Thanks.
--Macro is just an autoradioagram of something that can viewed and studied without use of a microscope. Microautoradiography, for example, generally uses a nuclear emulsion coating over labelled tissue sections that is subsequently examined with a microscope. Sammyj 00:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Autoradiograph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
In general, the introduction could use more detail about the general uses and history of autoradiography. Some simple detail about the uses would be nice - like what field it is used in or simple concepts behind the methodology explained. The coverage of material is neutral. The structure of the page is good but could use more organization. I will add a section about how autoradiographs are used in plant research. I will also add sources and links to my section. I am planning on adding a picture of an autoradiograph of a leaf with distinct minor-veins present and without any identifiable veins (In retrospect, I will not add a picture of an autoradiography because the images I have are unpublished images)
The other sections that are not specific to my field, I will leave alone (I am not going to edit something that I can not speak intelligently about). However, I am going to add internal links to existing phrases in sections added by other users, which will add more clarification to the article. Amp1104 ( talk) 13:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amp1104 ( talk • contribs) 20:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)