Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adamstom.97 ( talk · contribs) 11:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Grabbing this for review, shortly. - adamstom97 ( talk) 11:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC) reply

I see that this article was reviewed once before, but it didn't go anywhere due to lack of involvement on the reviewers part. I intend to see this through, and, in fact, I think this is a pretty great article. My only major issue with it is the references; all web references should be archived, so that they can be used whether the source exists or not. - adamstom97 ( talk) 22:35, 18 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Okay, it looks like that has been addressed, so I'm going to go ahead and promote this now. Well done. Passed - adamstom97 ( talk) 23:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Haha well this has been just about the easiest GA I've ever taken part in. Thanks!-- Changedforbetter ( talk) 03:48, 27 August 2016 (UTC) reply