This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Iraq High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Explosives Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The way the article is now, it does not make sense to have it as a separate article. The entire event can easily be covered in two or three sentences in Mustafa Al-Kadhimi's article. The intro tells everything, while one sentence is a rumour. The background section is unsourced and not directly connected. Reactions are standard stuff that politicians do, with no wider implications. Infobox adds very little. My redirect was reverted earlier. -- Tone 18:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

This attack is notable enough for its own article. It should be expanded rather than redirected. Jim Michael ( talk) 20:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Go ahead. Just listing reactions is not a valuable expansion, though (X condemned the attack in a statement). -- Tone 21:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

I agree with Jim, even if the article can be improved the article itself has significant coverage. -- NoonIcarus ( talk) 21:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Oppose: This article is pretty clearly expanded enough to merit existence. Dunutubble ( talk) 14:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC) reply