This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Atavista appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 June 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
isn’t this technically just a repackage of 3.15.20? 2600:6C56:6500:ADB6:9C36:24E4:41A6:9386 ( talk) 14:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk
20:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
JayceFey ( talk) 14:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Hi JayceFey! Just a small recommendation: While I am aware that Track listing and Personnel sections are generally citation-free, the final sentence of the Background section that mentions the absence of three tracks in the previous albums lacks a citation. It may have been intended as an extension of the primary source from the previous album, but I would advise citing it with a secondary source if possible. The hook is interesting. Second DYK nomination so QPQ-free. Earwig's Detector shows a 4.8% similarity, but it's not plagiarism after double checking. The article is well-written overall. Prince of Erebor( The Book of Mazarbul) 11:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Prince of Erebor! Has the issue been resolved? I added a citation to the section you mentioned. JayceFey ( talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
A section in the tracklist referring to the changes made to each track would be nice. Ollie2Ollie ( talk) 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)