Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cerebellum ( talk · contribs) 10:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article :) -- Cerebellum ( talk) 10:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you for offering to review this article. I was busy and missed the previous review but I did get around to handling all of the comments I got. If you have more comments I will try to get to it within a week or two. Jorahm ( talk) 17:28, 1 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Well that makes my job easy! Looks like GhostRiver did a thorough review, and I read through the article and found no other issues. So I'll go ahead and pass as GA. Congratulations! -- Cerebellum ( talk) 08:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC) reply

That is fantastic and thank you for giving it another look. Jorahm ( talk) 22:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC) reply