From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Luxtaythe2nd (
talk ·
contribs )
11:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
This is a point-by-point review of this article. Because the review requires me to do rather intense checking across the article, I will be doing this one by one. Helping and pointing out issues with the review is welcome.
Well written:
the prose is clear, concise, and
understandable
spelling and grammar are correct
it complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction ,
and
list incorporation
The article is well-written and avoids
weasels whenever it can.
Luxtay the
IInd (
talketh to me )
11:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Verifiable with no original research:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the
layout style guideline
all
inline citations are from
reliable sources , including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged
it contains no
original research
it contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism
Sources are all good, maybe could use more variety. No original research found, nearly every sentence is cited.
Broad in its coverage:
it addresses the
main aspects of the topic
it stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
Relatively short but swell. Compared to its size, it's interesting how many guidelines it checks out. Halfway through.
Luxtay the
IInd (
talketh to me )
12:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute
Illustrated , if possible, by media such as
images ,
video , or
audio :
media are tagged with their
copyright statuses , and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content
media are
relevant to the topic, and have suitable
captions .
Review done! Phew. Generally, I'd say this article, while pushing limits in some areas, is a good article.
Luxtay the
IInd (
talketh to me )
14:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
reply