This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The youtube video of this song has been destroyed thanks to this. I had to delete it. ] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.212.3 ( talk) 03:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Yes it is. Its sparking vandalism on other parts of the internet. Don't be selfish.
Its not that I don't like it, its just that I can cite people saying that they are spamming other sites based on this information. Whether this information is true or not, it would be a disservice to youtube for this information to remain present.
I'm really glad that you spent an hour or two reading wikipedia's rules, but even that says that Wikipedia does not contain clear vandalism, and I can safely assume it also includes information than encourages vandalism on other websites. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.212.212.3 (
talk)
21:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Third Opinion: While Wikipedia is not censored, which means we don't remove information because someone finds it objectionable, we also have a biography of living persons policy which requires that information on living people is attributable to a reliable source. As there is no source listed for the information in question, it may be removed until a source can be found. —BradV 04:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm not saying that I disagree with it, I'm saying that Wikipedia is providing a diservice to the Internet (in this case, Youtube) by allowing this information to be present. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.212.212.3 (
talk)
21:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
This actress has a personal website with photos which can all be used, rather than the generic. I'd upload but (obviously) can't. So, for anyone who can, here's a useable image ( http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo111/Ashleydenee/Website%20Images/AshleyGreene.jpg). Ashleydenee ( talk) 01:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
I have full protected the article for 24 hrs due to edit warring and reinsertion of the potentially BLP violating nude photos information.
If consensus here on the article talk page and on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Ashley Greene thread is that it's ok to add it then any administrator can undo the full protect at any time, but I do not recommend doing so without a consensus forming. ` Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 02:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I'd just like to point out that due to the substantial effects which such photo releases can have I do feel they are pertinent to celebrity related entries. I'd also like to point out that my re-edit of the information back into the article was fully tasteful, while previous edits (performed by 76.182.220.212) made blatant implications as to Ashley Greene's intentions and were obviously trolling the page. I don't feel there is so much an 'edit war' going on as there is a desire to keep the information on the page in a tasteful fashion rather than making jabs at Greene's personal attitude as 76.182.220.212 was doing.
- 69.71.229.32 —Preceding undated comment added 06:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC).
I've tried twice to specify that it was only 1 nude and 1 topless photo that leaked. I feel as though saying "nude photos" leaked gives the impression that it was like Paris Hilton with 500 photos floating around the web. It seems less of an issue if it is only 1 photo, in my opinion, I'd like to hear others thoughts on this. I feel this is one instance where being specific would be appropriate. Especially since the frontal nude one doesn't even have her face in frame. Dee1980dee ( talk) 19:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
The reference seems to have been taken down. It's agreed that there are indeed 3 nude photos that have been leaked of her, so why has any mention of this magically disappeared? I can link to a website with them if need be. 24.18.109.9 ( talk) 14:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand why the nude pictures aren't referenced. She is a woman of legal age with nude pictures floating around for her own good.
We all know these stars get these pictures and videos out there to get buzz going about them. It's not being a 'tabloid' when you reference things people have done to get attention in the media.
Wikipedia has/had no problem defending it's child pornography standing for how many years so I don't see what this problem is. Woods01 ( talk) 06:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
so now we have two versions of her name. Greene and Greene-Pattinson. Which one is it? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 02:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
it should be mentioned that twilight made Muse famous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.34.156.255 ( talk) 18:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Year | Title | Artist | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
2005 | " Dangerous and Moving" | t.A.T.u | |
2010 | "Kiss Me Kill Me" | Mest |
i have moved this here because it was entered without sources and without verification should not stay in the article in case its false. if it can be proved, then it can be added back in. -- Stripy Socks ( talk) 14:17, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Why does it say Summer's Blood was "Originally titled Summer's Blood". That's simply retarded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.95.33.129 ( talk) 01:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Because the movie is actually "Summer's Moon". Why they are using the word blood I don't know. Whit77 ( talk) 07:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the Filmography section, change GBGB to CBGB. See movie Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/CBGBtheMovie Mathfair ( talk) 17:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ashley Greene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
ADD Section for Entrepreneur: Ashley Greene is the Co-Founder of "Fridgits" along with husband Paul Khoury, sister-in-law Sarah Khoury, and close family friend, Sophia Silva.
Citations: https://www.usmagazine.com/entertainment/news/fridgits-ashley-greene-food-nft-female-entrepreneurs/ https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/celebrity/ashley-greene-launches-first-nft-food-game-with-team-of-female-entrepreneurs/ar-AAUgjWf https://www.Fridgits.com Fridgits ( talk) 23:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On March 25, 2022, Greene and her husband announced they were expecting their first child together. 2600:387:C:7114:0:0:0:8 ( talk) 18:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)