A fact from Armenian National Congress (1917) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Armenian National Congress (1917) is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to
Armenia and
Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the
project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
This article, like several others on Armenian topics that I have observed, is told from a very unilateral POV, only the Armenian one. No info on Russian or neighbouring Caucasian nations' (basicly Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey but also Iran) is included. This attitude is harming WP. I added a POV tag. --
E4024 (
talk)
22:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)reply
If this organization was very influential and worth article on WP, then it is very surprising that ONLY Armenian sources wrote about it. If third-party reliable and verifiable sources are not provided in near future, this article has to be suggested for speedy deletion. Best,
195.212.29.190 (
talk)
12:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Aw, come on, it's
Konullu (
talk·contribs), isn't it? Who else tag-bombs Armenian articles with
[1] "POV" and "RefImprove" and signs his talk page comments "Best"? Who else loves to "speedy delete" articles he doesn't like? --
Folantin (
talk)
14:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)reply
What the hell are you on about? Look in the bloody "Sources" section. Everybody knows this is really just about your blatant POV-pushing. --
Folantin (
talk)
21:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)reply
1. POV and Refimprove templates are different. My aim is to improve references, I am not deleting, opposing, arguing, questioning anything.
2. Sources section lists them, but the links are not provided and if we can provide verifiable sources (e.g. links to those researches, readable versions, etc.), let's provide them as well. Best,
Konullu (
talk)
23:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)reply