The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Closing after 6 days, 11-0 in favour of move. --GW_Simulations _{User Page | Talk} 23:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC) reply

• Ares IV → Ares IV (Star Trek)
• Ares IV (launch vehicle) → Ares IV

Ares IV (launch vehicle) is about a real proposal for a rocket, which has a good chance of being built. This article is about a ficticious spaceship from the Star Trek universe. I would say that the rocket proposal is more notable, and therefore it should have the name Ares IV, and this page should be moved elsewhere, with a disambiguation link on the new Ares IV page linking to it. --GW_Simulations _{User Page | Talk} 12:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

1. Nominate and Support --GW_Simulations _{User Page | Talk} 12:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC) reply
2. Support per nom. PC78 14:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC) reply
3. Support. Grant 16:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC) reply
4. Support per nom. GassyGuy 20:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC) reply
5. Support per nom. Bchan 21:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC) reply
6. Support because reality is more important than fiction. Rdl381 00:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC) reply
7. Support I don't even think the Star Trek ship is notable enough to warrant the page by itself. It should be merged into a greater article about Trek ships. 205.157.110.11 01:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC) reply
8. Support 75.14.58.185 01:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC) reply
9. Support -- Reality should always trump fiction. -- Altanar 01:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC) reply
10. Support, WP:SNOW? -- Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント ( talk) 00:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC) reply
11. Support and delete the Star Trek page or merge it into something else. — Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 06:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.