This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't this be 'post-Rock indie band'?
It sure should. I've reverted it! Incidentally, four tildes (the wiggly lines like this ~) will add your username and the time and date to your posts here. Nmg20 22:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
"At first essentially an electro-acoustic band with a brooding, spare sound later albums and gigs saw them develop a fuller sound which drew deeply on both indie and dance music."
is this right? there's a song from their first gig on "ten years of tears" and they sound like joy division!
Concerning the [citation needed] in the history section: Towards the end of "The first big weekend" Moffat says: "... later that evening Malcolm introduced me to the power of Merrydown - 1.79 a litre, 8.2% - mmmm....." Does that qualify as a source? Janlemmi ( talk) 13:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Wrong. They sing in a Scottish ACCENT but they don't sing in Scots dialect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.235.42 ( talk) 08:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move. Considering that there is no longer an article on the sexual device, there's even less point in disambiguating the band. Cúchullain t/ c 18:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
– Per Wikipedia:DIFFCAPS. Unreal7 ( talk) 18:35, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
The article on the sexual device was redirected
01:06, 27 October 2017 El cid, el campeador (talk | contribs | block) . . (23 bytes) (-3,905) . . (95% of article is OR, with no helpful sources. It is a type of cock ring, so there it goes)
almost a year ago. Actually OR might be kind... for much of its history the article has been spam. Does the sexual device exist in reliable sources? That's the first question to ask.
If so, then we need to ask, has any useful content on the topic ever existed in Wikipedia? If so we probably want to preserve it, and that means preserving its edit history. Lots to consider. Andrewa ( talk) 05:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)