There are three statements in the article that appear to be validly tagged as needing citations. These are minor but important statements that should be easy to find sources for. Ultimately, I think these may put the nomination on hold, but not willing to fail the nomination at the present time without allowing them to be corrected. Generally, the article seems at first glance to be well cited, a thorough examination will be forthcoming.
Triona (
talk)
23:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Down to one citation needed tag in
Appalachian_Trail#Virginia. I'd like to see this fixed, but I'm inclined to pass anyway because the climatological data for the region I was able to find seems to support it, just couldn't find a reference that supports the statement in a straightforward manner.
Triona (
talk)
02:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC)reply
There are a number of references that can no longer be checked because they are now dead links. See the
link checker report. If they can be replaced with working links, or if the article no longer relies on them, might be a good idea to remove them.
Triona (
talk)
09:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)reply
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Broad coverage, follows summary style where appropriate, focuses on details where appropriate.
Not going to hold the nomination over this, still want to see phrasing like "more scenic" cut out or attributed specifically.
Triona (
talk)
02:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC)reply
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Currently appears to be fairly stable. Article is still undergoing apparently noncontroversial improvements, and no evidence of edit warring is to be seen.
Triona (
talk)
22:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)reply
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
As of 23:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC) all images are appropriately tagged. There is one image tagged as fair use (of the official AT logo) that appears to be used appropriately with respect to it's rationale, and the rationale given appears to be a valid claim of fair use.
Triona (
talk)
23:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)reply