From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk ·
contribs )
13:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
reply
Will take this one. Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail )
13:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
reply
@
Sp33dyphil : Extremely sorry for the delay. Will complete this soon. Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail )
14:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
reply
You're alright. I was just waiting for the article to settle anyway after having added more content. Thank you for taking this on. Regards, --
Sp33dyphil (
talk )
14:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
reply
@
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga : - have you lost track of this review?
Parsecboy (
talk )
19:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
@
Parsecboy and
Sp33dyphil : Sorry for the delay, and thanks for reminding. Take my word, this review will be done within three days. --Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail )
02:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
No problem, I was looking at clearing out some of the older reviews at GAN, and saw you might need a reminder here :)
Parsecboy (
talk )
02:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
Lead and infobox; all good
Section 1;
Link An-12 twin-engine turboprop aircraft
Link Soviet Armed Forces
DASA depended on data provided by Antonov and was not able to test-fly the aircraft themselves; what is the reason?
repaired it in record time; how much?
Section 2, 3, 4, 5; All good. A very well written article, just a few corrections.
Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail )
05:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written .
a (prose, spelling, and grammar) : b (
MoS for
lead ,
layout ,
word choice ,
fiction , and
lists ) :
It is factually accurate and
verifiable .
a (
reference section ) : b (citations to
reliable sources ) : c (
OR ) : d (
copyvio and
plagiarism ) :
It is broad in its coverage .
a (
major aspects ) : b (
focused ) :
It follows the
neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales ) : b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions ) :
Overall :
Pass/Fail :
Sorry for the delay. G'work.Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail )
13:06, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
reply