This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve
ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
oceans,
seas, and
bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from
Aral Sea; check
La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from
MS Estonia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New Zealand and
New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
The map, nice as it is, is very confusing; as far as I can see it does not illustrate the subject at all. Am I wrong? --
Jao (
talk)
11:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)reply
I don't particularly like the statement in the article that
This line, like the Arctic tree line, is a natural boundary rather than an artificial one, like a line of latitude.
The Arctic tree line is a biological boundary, and difficult to define as a distinction between shrubs and trees has to be made: the Antarctic Convergence is hydrological, and perhaps best compared to watersheds or the tropical convergence phenomenon: it's not like the tree line, where trees will gradually give way to shrubs and then the last few straggling trees will disappear.
46.114.153.166 (
talk)
13:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)reply
I suppose the stated temperature drop is in ocean (not air) temperature. The article doesn't say which. I don't want to guess-change the article. Could someone who knows specify? -
173.28.188.227 (
talk)
15:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Do we need the list of places 'north of the Antarctic Convergence'? Isn't everywhere on Earth that isn't south of the Antarctic Convergence, north of the Antarctic Convergence?
DS (
talk)
23:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)reply
You are right, the relevant sections should better be titled 'Places next north of the Antarctic Convergence' and 'Places next south of the Antarctic Convergence'.
Apcbg (
talk)
12:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Location
There is something wrong in the last line of this paragraph. My idea is that the first two figures should be 2.8 C degrees, and 5.0 F degrees, rather than 2.8 degrees C and 5.0 degrees F. This would jibe approximately with the other figures. In any case, 5.0F is definitely not equivalent to 2.8C.
Mathyeti (
talk)
05:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)reply