This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Brazil and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
No one was claiming to know more about her than you. However, you should familiarize yourself with
WP:OWN, which states that all Wikipedia content is edited collaboratively. This means that no one single person has the authority to decide what goes into the article. The community here operates on consensus. As to why I reverted the article back to a prior version, you had edited the infobox to link to a picture, which was uploaded to commons, and then deleted for being a non-free file. All I did was simply revert back to a version of the article that had a functional photo. If you can provide a different or better freely-licensed photo for the article, please feel free to upload it to Commons and edit the article again.
Phuzion (
talk)
20:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Requested move 7 November 2020
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
As the author of, I think,
the only article on an individual tattoo or set of tattoos, I was excited to see a new article of that type. However, reading that article, it is not about a tattoo—which would be a clearly distinct thing from a person. In fact, the article says almost nothing about the tattoo, as no one knows for sure what it says. The article is, rather, about a single controversy in Anitta's life. Per
Wikipedia:Content forks § Caution, having a separate article on a controversial incident may give undue weight to that incident. And
WP:NOPAGE, the main guideline for merge/split considerations, asks us to consider whether content will make more sense in the context of the larger article. This article, about a single minor controversy in Anitta's life, would absolutely make more sense in our biography on Anitta, and there are
WP:NPOV and
WP:BLP implications in having them separate.
This article could probably be reduced to:
Anitta has a
tattoo on her anus, reported to read "love"[1] or "I
luvu".[2][3] Video of her receiving the tattoo, which she had posted on her
OnlyFans account, was leaked in February 2021.[4] In May 2022,
sertanejo singer Zé Neto, part of
the duo with Cristiano [
pt, said in a speech he did not need funds from the
Rouanet Law, nor did he need to get a tattoo on his "toba" (slang for
anus)[5] to show he is doing well, leading to conflict with Anitta's fans.[4][6] In April 2023, rappers
MC Daniel [
pt and Nog released a song titled "* da Anitta". Despite the provocative title, the singer herself embraced the song, expressing amusement rather than offense.[7][8]
Which could be added to the end of
Anitta (singer) § Public image. Some or all of the two paragraphs about
Gusttavo Lima, which are only tangential to the rest of this article, could be merged to his article. Basically everything else is extraneous detail, contributing to an article that gives undue focus to an intimate and sexualized aspect of someone's life, all while tying her to a poorly-explained political scandal involving other people. --
Tamzin[
cetacean needed (
they|xe)
05:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Disagree. I acknowledge the proposition presented by the nominator, although I hold a different viewpoint. Anitta’s tattoo and its consequences are an episode of significant repercussion in Brazilian media and popular culture and, as I noted a few days ago,
even garnered attention in academic circles of another Lusophone country, namely, Portugal. Considering this, I would support a potential renaming of the page to underscore the profound impact the tattoo has had on Brazilian society. It’s important to clarify that there exists a plethora of additional sources that can be referenced in the article. When the nominator mentions tangential sources (probably
this one), they overlook the fact that these sources often include hyperlinks leading to more in-depth information on the subject (
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here, and certainly elsewhere). Furthermore, individuals involved in the episode, such as the tattoo artist, received extensive coverage in the media (
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here, and so on). The same applies to the creators of the song that references the tattoo (
here,
here,
here,
here, and so on). Therefore, I believe that merging the articles would either create undue weight or make the content overly sparse for the reader. I emphasize that this is not a minor controversy in the singer’s life, but an episode that received significant attention at the initial time and still persists in the collective memory of the Brazilian people today (
here for example), considering that Anitta still makes references to the tattoo and to the entire related episode. Despite creating the article during a period of personal hardship, I remain committed to expanding it further.
Skyshifter reviewed the nomination for the
WP:DYK, creates many articles about internet phenomena, so perhaps he might be interested in the subject, possibly aiding in the construction of the article. Best regards and thanks for the interest in the subject,
RodRabelo7 (
talk)
06:09, 29 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge it.
Tamzin is correct, of course. That something could stand by itself is no reason to make it so, and this is more than a bit undue, sensational, and hyped. No, adding "controversy" makes it even worse. Merging, with some pruning to leave only high-quality sources (there are some, I assume) is a perfectly reasonable thing to do.
Drmies (
talk)
23:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Support I agree with Tamzin. Having an article about a tattoo on someone's arsehole is exceedingly
WP:UNDUE. Just because it can stand alone, doesn't mean it should. It should be merged. TarnishedPathtalk13:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply