This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
I've written many stubs on bilateral relations, but these relations do not pass
WP:GNG. Rather than nominate it for deletion, I suggest we simply merge the one sentence which is not already included in the various foreign relations articles. Where are the multiple independent sources?--
TM22:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Well, if that is really needed, i will find them. I am from those people that think that international bilateral relation is WP:N by it self. But i will try to expand it a bit. --WhiteWriter speaks22:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)reply
As you know, that is not the consensus opinion. Considering the distance, relatively small size of both economies and lack of historic interaction, it is best to merge the content than have many small articles which will never be expanded beyond 2 or 3 sentences.--
TM23:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)reply