This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
The text here seems a bit of a mash-up: Offerings which mention more than 1 god begin the offering list section with "di.sn" (they may give), not "di.f" (he may give). There's also no mention of the post-12/13th dynasty "dd.t pt" bit, (which heaven gives, the earth creates, the inundation brings, etc). Hope to rewrite, but a bit too busy to manage a properly reference article at the moment! Can someone else step up? --
Cliau01:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Unfortunatly my only source on the Hotp di nesu comes from gardiner. I might be able to get another source from my library within a few days, but I have other projects I'm working on here at the same time. So I can step up, but it'll take a while for me as well. Anyone else?
Thanatosimii04:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)reply
This book [1] has a detailed section showing each part of the formula with many variations and examples. I have not seen the "post-12/13th dynasty "dd.t pt" bit" mentioned in the book, nor does it make specific mention the "di.sn" part. However, some of the stelae reproduced in the book do show "di.sn" being used (good call,
User:Cliau),
^Collier M; Manley B (1998). How to Read Egyptian Hieroglyphs. London, England: University of California Press. pp. 35–39.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Ancient Egyptian offering formula. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
A quick look at the history of both wiki pages shows that the material on the Wikipedia page came first, and the other was copied from here. In fact, the other article even has a disclaimer at the bottom that says as much, so I don’t think there’s any copyright problems here or there.
Vorziblix (
talk)
14:41, 2 June 2019 (UTC)reply
ḏi or di?
The word in question is written X8. Within the article I see it's spelled ḏi, whereas in the transliterations it's spelled di. (I myself am only a beginner when it comes to hieroglyphics, but I learned di.) What's going on here? Is this a matter of pronunciation changes going from Old to Middle Egyptian? Or is one of the spellings just wrong?
2601:49:C301:D810:91DA:1E6C:4FB:FFE0 (
talk)
23:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)reply
@
2601:49:C301:D810:91DA:1E6C:4FB:FFE0: According to Allen's Middle Egyptian (page 504 in the third edition, which I have, as opposed to the second, which this article cites), X8 originally represented ḏi when used phonetically, but the standard value is di. So I'm guessing it is a change from Old to Middle Egyptian, though the book doesn't say so explicitly.
A. Parrot (
talk)
01:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)reply