![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In this article it is stated that Ampthill tunnel has three bores, whereas in the Ampthill Tunnel article, the tunnel is described as having two bores. I seem to remember two, but maybe I'm mistaken. Anybody? Everybody got to be somewhere! ( talk) 22:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)Part of the second para in the station's History section reads:
"At the time it was built there were no coaching connections, so for a number of years it was particularly beneficial in providing an outlet for the trade in straw hats, Ampthill's speciality being the "Narrow Improved" version. "
is there some information missing that would make sense of this? Andywebby ( talk) 17:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ampthill railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC)