This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The moderator has done a poor job on this page for the last 4 years. While citing overly-stringent Wikipedia policy, he or she has left this web page in disarray. A more even-handed, knowledgeable editor/moderator is needed who can balance the multiple policy goals of wikipedia in a fair manner that serves the interest of the reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.41.31.9 ( talk) 22:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Repeated addition of material like these [1] [2] [3] [4] do not comply with WP guidance and policy such as WP:EL, WP:SOAPBOX, and WP:RS; however, they do highlight a lack of coverage in our article of dissent. Addition of well-sourced encyclopedic material on this subject to the body of this article would be worthwhile. I have asked for input from others on this topic. -- Scray ( talk) 13:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Changeboardrecert.com is actually a website with articles from the medical literature that provide a reasoned argument to the ABIM propaganda present in this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.89.87.6 ( talk • contribs) 17:37, 17 October 2012
Again the website has peer reviewed articles outlining a reasoned case against the maintenance of certification program of the ABIM. That is why it really should be allowed on the page, as it is the single best source of reliable sources! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.141.160.175 ( talk) 00:12, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
including more than 8,000 physicians holding certifications that hold certifications which are valid indefinitely — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheCat ( talk • contribs) 14:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
I think this is interesting.