![]() | Amber MacArthur was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How old or when is Amber's Birthday?
An anonymous user added that Amber MacArthur was in several Canadian porn films. A Google search failed to verify this. Since, if false such statements qualify as defamation, I removed it. Can anyone verify this conclusively as true/false? -- Zwilson 06:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Somebody under the ip User:70.50.136.151 wrote in the article that Amber is leaving G4techTV. It is confirmed on her blog at http://ambermac.typepad.com/ambermac/2006/08/to_all_the_g4te.html
I will clean up that section and re post it. Amp e rsand2006 ( & ) 18:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
I know Amber Macarthur is young and smart but she is spreading herself to thin and it’s going to catch up with her. She needs to slow down and to focus. Mike Scott
I've added a new image of Amber. She agreed via MySpace email to release any of her pics as CC for Wikipedia. -- Zanimum 18:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry but this is a fail.
Basically the article needs to be expanded a lot and formatted. good-luck feel free to try again for GA once these issues are dealt with. M3tal H3ad 06:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
The problem is that Amber is not "well known." Obviously this is a relative term. I think George Stroumboulopoulos is an example of a well known media personality. He is vastly more widely known than Amber, yet has a shorter wiki article. The lengthiness of Amber's article, coupled with the lack of citations, sensational elements (eg. her association with Tony Robbins) make this article seem suspiciously promotional. Aliengruvgod ( talk) 02:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
This article needs to be cleaned. There are too many un-cited statements in the "Personal life" section. Article is very short and feels bloated. Maybe it deserves a Stub template?
-- Ts1and2fanatic ( talk) 01:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Her Martial Status and the way it may effect the parentage of her child is non-encyclopedic and should not be part of the article. It in no way has any barring on her job as tech journalist. David Reiss ( talk) 01:11, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Are they? I noticed Leo said 'hubby' on natn 98, but he may have meant it informally. Dwmg ( talk) 13:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
NCSS - Her marital status and discussion around her son are well documented - Amber continues to discuss these facts. The community is not sure why such a neutral and documented fact causes you contention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.51.53.130 ( talk) 18:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
As I write this it is February 6, 2009 and the article says her son was born on February 8, 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.87.21 ( talk) 02:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Why is this 15 minutes of fame nominee listed in wiki? Answer: using wiki as a social media platform for self promotion. Minimal accomplishments or relevance. Should be deleted. Wikipedia is not FLICKR or Facebook or Twitter. Go sell self promotion somewhere else, we all full up here at Wiki.
There are some IP editors that seem to not be able to control themselves from adding superfluous and non-encyclopedic information that is person in nature. While I have placed warnings on those user's pages, I wonder if semi-protection might be in order here? What does everyone else think? NCSS ( talk) 20:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
In this case, it would seem that protection would not be warranted at this stage. NCSS has continued to remove bibliographical information in a biased manner. The use of protection for an article in order to enforce biased removals, such as these, would seem to be a misuse of an important editorial quality control tool.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Amber MacArthur. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm from PEI and have never heard of this person. 24.137.115.238 ( talk) 03:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Amber MacArthur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Amber MacArthur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.citynews.ca/webnationWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)