This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
Double Down News is listed here though not apparently notable enough to have its own article. An article was created for it by
STonyG, nominated for speedy deletion by
Buidhe and then redirected here by
Ritchie333. It seems wrong to me to redirect here, where it is simply listed in passing - and indeed I'd question whether it is noteworthy enough to be listed here. Any thoughts?
BobFromBrockley (
talk)
15:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Labour List is emphatically NOT “left wing”. I get it’s bulletin daily: it supports the Starmer right factional wing of the party. To call it “centrist” would be far more accurate. LL, that is, not Starmer Labour which is now solidly conservative/Conservative with some progressive postures and policies thrown in to appease core progressive Labourites.
my bona fides: Doctorate in modern history (2021) and follower of UK electoral politics for some decades.