![]() | Alliance for Financial Inclusion was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 22, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:52, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: David Eppstein ( talk · contribs) 18:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Created, edited, and nominated by a single-purpose account who, when questioned over a potential conflict-of-interest, gave a suspiciously-specific denial that neither he nor his family were actually employees of the organization. Tagged with a COI banner since June. Working Groups section is entirely self-sourced, Members is unsourced, and Donors and partners is self-sourced. It's not clear that any of the sources are independent, reliable, and in-depth about this organization. Vague and promotional language (e.g. "there was an emerging recognition") also problematic with respect to Good Article criteria 1. A long way from meeting GA criterion 2 and probably 1 and 4. Has major cleanup banner that is plausibly valid. WP:GAFAIL. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)