This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Christian music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lutheranism Low‑importance Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr from the German Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's " European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

A fact from Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 May 2017 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that "' Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr" is one of the oldest hymns of the Reformation? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr.

This is categorised as "1523 works" yet the year 1523 isn't mentioned at all. The Rambling Man ( talk) 06:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

1522/23 is mentioned. We'll never know for sure, but this was translated. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

So it's probably better off being a Category:1520s works, right? The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Then it would be 1520s in English, but 1523 in German. The Gotteslob says simply 1523. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Gerda, I'm just asking the cats to reflect the article. The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

It's not that easy. The main source, the book in which it appears, has one year, - just the scientists are more careful. "1520s" doesn't reflect "1523 the latest", which is important compared to Luther's 1524. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Well the cat and the article should say the same thing. If there's any doubt, it should be 1520s. The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The German article just says 1523. I am close to adopting that. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Whatever the RS say. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

One source says 1522/23, several say simply 1523. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

So to be safe, it's 1520s. The Rambling Man ( talk) 04:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC) reply

I worded differently. 1522/23 may mean "we don't know" or "begun in 1522, completed in 1523". The books I can see where it's printed today say simply 1523, so do I now. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC) reply