The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 12th-century All Saints Church, Patcham, largely unchanged since the 14th century, was rebuilt or restored four times in a 74-year period from 1824?
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource about Brighton and Hove. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project pageBrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton articles
I'll check over this soon; I don't mind if improvements may need a bit more than seven days to be made, but please don't make this review stretch past a month or so :) /
ƒETCHCOMMS/19:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Y Well, everything's been addressed quickly and I've read through the article a few times now with nothing else popping up. I don't know anything about English churches but I'm going to pass this nomination as I do know the GA criteria :). Congrats and good work! /
ƒETCHCOMMS/21:45, 17 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Expand the lede a bit. The article is about 15,000 characters, so the MOS recommends 2–3 paragraphs. I'd say two is good because the recommendation is for 15k–30k.
For "... a survey in 1825 by Sir Stephen Glynn of the Ecclesiological Society noted that it was "decently fitted up"—[13] ..." the ref goes before the dash, per
WP:REFPUN.
Just about all of the images are stacked on the right. Could a couple be moved to the left, so it doesn't look like a photo gallery on one side and a wall of text on the other side?
Done All images are freely licensed, no non-free media to worry about, so this looks good.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
All Saints Church, Patcham. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.