This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Shouldn't there be a picture of the building before it was damaged by the explosion? After all, this is the article about the building itself, not the bombing. 69.121.66.69 18:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
So did the building not have ATF offices anymore at the time it was bombed? See http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/serial_killers/notorious/mcveigh/trial_8.html EVCM ( talk) 06:43, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
When referring to the destroyed building, most sources refer to it specifically as the "Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building". The replacement is just given (from what I can tell) the descriptive title of "Oklahoma City federal building". Should there be a separate article for the new building? At least a section in this article dedicated to the new building? Surely not everyone who types in "Oklahoma City federal building" is looking for the destroyed building? Dustin (talk) 04:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Just looking through existing photographs of the artworks listed in this section. Do you really feel it's warranted? For example, the 'sisal textile piece' by Karen Chapnick is literally a door mat hung on the wall. We're talking modern art here of spurious value on insurance policies not great works of art or ancient pieces. Half of the things listed are just blown up photographic prints. They're all replacaeable things. When I see a list of 'artwork lost' I damn well want it to be something precious and irreplaceable enough to be more notable than the lives lost, and I don't think a list of lives lost would be appropriate due to space constraints and would submit that so to should we not include a list of crappy art. Crappy in value / worth not design as that's in the eye of the beholder, one mans bath mat is another mans David due to the prevalence of autism and high income liquidity. But c'mon, let's be serious here. <!//– ☠ ʇdɯ0ɹd ɥsɐq ☠ // user // talk // twitter //–> 04:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:54, 1 July 2017 (UTC)