Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Very thorough article, could even benefit from a bit of compression. The introduction section is way too long, but still short compared to the actual article...
No glaring faults, fixed a couple of red links; couldn't verify sources (books), but they seemed legit.
Reviewer: Sigmundur ( talk) 17:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)