From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Elliot321 (
talk ·
contribs )
06:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
reply
Going to be reviewing this article, thanks for nominating it.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs )
06:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
reply
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Is it well written ?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation :
Is it
verifiable with no original research ?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline :
B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources , including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged , and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines :
The endorsements for Crowley should have a better source than his campaign page - this isn't likely to be a major issue - and including sources for all the individual endorsements would be ridiculous here, maybe include them in the main article on the election (which also currently only uses this source)?
C. It contains
no original research :
D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism :
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ):
Is it
neutral ?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable ?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images ?
A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status , and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content :
B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions :
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
The only issue is the reference for the Crowley endorsements, if that's fixed it passes. If the issue isn't addressed within seven days, I'll fail it.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs )
07:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
reply
@
Elliot321 : The issue has been fixed.
Some Dude From North Carolina
wanna talk?
17:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
reply
@
Some Dude From North Carolina : "people for bernie" on Twitter isn't really a RS either, though the rest of the additions are significant improvements.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs )
20:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
reply
@
Elliot321 : I have replaced the reference.
Some Dude From North Carolina
wanna talk?
20:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
reply
@
Some Dude From North Carolina : not sure if
People's World is really considered reliable, but I haven't seen evidence that it isn't (while they obviously have a political lean, these are statements of fact). Passing the article.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs )
00:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
reply