This is the
talk page of a
redirect that has been
merged and now targets the page: • Apportionment paradox Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Apportionment paradox Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'd like to point out that the example is flawed, as the fair share is slightly off for the 69-seat case.
I have fiddled with some numbers in Excel and have come up with another example. I'll be changing the example in the article. LuckyWizard 06:56, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
The problem states that the paradox is a result of a larger size but the example shows a result of more seats and not a larger size. Can this be clarified? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.184.29 ( talk) 00:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
I am merging this page into Apportionment paradox. Tklalmighty ( talk) 03:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
You call that a "discussion", opened and closed at the same time? — Tamfang ( talk) 07:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)