This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Al-Nusra Front article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
"Moderate and conservative Islamists"... "moderate... Islamist"... lol who wrote this, the CIA? XD
The article should specify that only the southern rebels (which are a very small faction) are opposed to Al-Nusra. Northern rebels are staunchly pro Al-Nusra and coordinate with them. "Some factions" is a thereby a very imprecise term, since the southern rebels numbers are very small in comparison with the ones from the north. The northern factions cited in the article only nominally condemn al-nusra, while in practice they militarily coordinate with them. Idlib was taken by al-nusra coordinating with these northern factions cited in the article!
Nusra can not be of Kharijites, since it fights them. See ref. http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/01/09/who-are-the-kharijites-and-what-do-they-have-to-do-with-isis
A while back is seen israel on the side with ISIS in this article 198.180.155.241 ( talk) 14:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)