This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Islam Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Western Asia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It would be useful to give dates in the common system as well as the Islamic system.

What makes this a reliable source? - Sitush ( talk) 07:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply

And is "Fa al-Din Attar, trans. Arthur John Arberry, Muslim saints and mystics: episodes from the Tadhkirat al-Auliya' , Routledge, 1983 (reprint 2007), p. 52." intended to be a source or "Further reading"? If the former, then it needs to be cited inline; if the latter then it should be in its own section. - Sitush ( talk) 07:57, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply

It's NOT a reliable source. It's the personal website of some guru promoting his movement and claiming a bunch of fairytales about the subject of this article. It ought to be removed. MezzoMezzo ( talk) 06:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC) reply