This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the
Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support: An
Advanced Google search in
English over the last year for Akean excluding Aklan or Wikipedia gives 63 hits (page through to the last result and you get 47 unduplicated hits). A
similar search for Aklan excluding Akean or Wikipedia gives 33,400 hits (455 unduplicated hits). Even taking into account that some of the Aklan results are not referring to the river, but to
Aklan province, it is clear from looking at the individual results that Aklan is overwhelmingly preferred for the river. If you contain the searches to sites in the
Philippines, then Akean gets just one false result, and nothing else.
Skinsmoke (
talk)
04:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.