This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on
Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current
discussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 2021-08-03 by
Fourthords (
talk·contribs).
DeanneSalinger (
talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (
[1])
Airforceamy (
talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (
[2])
174.83.254.218 (
talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (
[3])
Dmz5, don't be a skeptic. she's definitely a highly decorated veteran and counterterrorism specialist and international body guard and prostitute. cmon. cmon... ok, yeah let's delete it. -
Taco325i02:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)reply
It would do a disservice to decorated veterans and counterterrorism specialists if a prostitute falsely claimed to be such. As the article stands, we have no way to show that the assertions are true. Without sources which meet
WP:ATT the unsupported claims can be removed.
Edison19:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
The "John L. Levitow" award is not a decoration, there is no ribbon. It is an award given to the top grad at the NCO Perpetory Course. As such, bizzilions of these are given out every year. I have one, as it happens. In any case, the sources of this section are highly suspect. Her own website is cited, but clearly it is an unreliable source filled mostly with fiction. Shortly, I will remove the entire section.
Proxy User (
talk)
17:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)reply
It is not possible to rank higher than Senior Airman on one's first enlistment, and don't think as a non-NCO a Senior Airman would be teaching much because they are generally in "upgrade training" themselves. It's not a believable story, although I'm sure it works with some guys for the fantasy. She is "interesting" to look at...
Proxy User (
talk)
04:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)reply
That's not true. I tested for Staff (E-5) in 3 years. Maybe today it isn't possible - I wouldn't know because I got out in '91. But back in the 80's it was. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
75.145.59.90 (
talk)
00:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)reply
(
Personal attack removed) First, I am an Agent of the Diplomatic Security Service. We've never opened a case with her, and we would never work with a SrA (no offense AF types). Also, the one holy grail here...she has absolutely zero air force record. She never enlisted. She's never served a day in her life in the military. I've been in the military for 10 years before I became a DS Agent. There is no way in holy hell that she has such a record. Her ribbons are fake, she wasn't involved in nearly anything she claims. Here is a link to her DD-214 military records service request...which unsurprisingly came up "nope" :
http://thisainthell.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Donice-Armstrong-FOIA.jpg
Air Force Amy, just be a good hooker. Stop the charades. You slap us all in the face by your lies. Records don't lie. Neither does our internal record system of cases or individuals we've worked with in DSS. You are pathetic.
72.66.111.204 (
talk)
12:34, 4 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Over the past few months, DOB & birth name has been multiple times, mainly by an IP but on 1 occasion by
Airforceamy. Myself and other editors have reverted these changes. The edit summary (where given), started with "showing my DOB is destroying my business" and has grown into "I implore you to remove my real name and DOB. None of my work is cited as Deanne Salinger. This whole page is about my stage and work name Deanne Salinger. Please see this article to see some of the dangers of having my really famous prostitute name published along with my stage name. i feel in danger due to this. If you can't remove my name and DOB, remove my page altogether."
Her name and DOB are freely available online, for example
[5] and
[6], so any stalker/wrongdoer could easily obtain them whether they are on WP or not.
WP:DOB covers this and I don't see why you need to go straight to a full-blown thirty-day formal RfC when I see no indication that the suggestions at
WP:RFCBEFORE have been followed let alone exhausted. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
22:41, 30 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The subject of the article is requesting that her name and date of birth be omitted on the basis of privacy concerns and concerns for her safety. I think the request is a valid one and should be respected.
Bus stop (
talk)
15:00, 15 June 2019 (UTC)reply
WP:BLPPRIVACY sums it up: "Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public. If a subject complains about our inclusion of their date of birth, or the person is borderline
notable, err on the side of caution and simply list the year, provided that there is a reliable source for it." Has this information been widely published? Do we AGF that the listed connected contributors are AFA? Do we even have an acceptable
reliable source for her year-of-birth alone, as the policy requires? — Fourthords |
=Λ= |17:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)reply
adminhelp
This
request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
The first reference [1] was put there by a disgruntled journalist(Mitchell Sunderland). He replaced the correct and original reference with that of his tabloid "Vice" article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
DeanneSa (
talk •
contribs)
00:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
That isn't the case. I changed the ref on 25 August 2018 as part of routine maintenance as the previous link was dead and hadn't been archived. Nothing to do with Mitchell Sunderland. --
John B123 (
talk)
00:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
You have not indicated any administrative task that you want performed. If this is a dispute over whether a source is reliable, as it seems to be, then administrators have no more say than anyone else, and the thing to do is to post to
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. If you do so, then please explain why yo think the source is unreliable, rather than making comments about other editors, such as saying that they are "disgruntled".
JBW (
talk) Formerly JamesBWatson16:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Also, for what it's worth,
there is no consensus thatVice is an unreliable source for the English Wikipedia, much less that its a
tabloid. As for the Vice article itself, it appears to be well-researched and include snippets of an interview with Air Force Amy herself, nothing I see any reason to exclude as a source on the topic. — Fourthords |
=Λ= |17:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply