![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:UCK NLA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 11:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
The addition of the material "Bosniak propaganda about Ahmići massacre" by an IP and Aradic-es by these two adjacent edits 1st, 2nd. Then subsequent edit war with ICTYoda and mainly PRODUCER to keep this material in is highly inflamatory. This what I call a whinge about Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims) using the massacre as propaganda against Croats, when in 1993 up to 120 people including babies and old women were massacred in what the International War Crimes Tribuanl has ruled crimes against humanity. This completely highlights a lack of any perspective and is bordering on abusiveness. Aradic-es cites three blogs as sources. This sort of nonsense should not be welcome on wikipedia and I have completely lost my sympathy with Aradic-es's complaints about being reverted. Polargeo ( talk) 08:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
The number killed cannot just be changed like this without getting a reference for the new number. Wikipedia relies on being verifiable. The number 103 is stated as "According to the ECMM report, at least 103 people were killed during the attack on Ahmići" and it appears that this is correct. If the actual number after more research has been done is 116 then you can add that in but you need a source. At present the article says "at least 103" not "103" Polargeo ( talk) 08:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
This paragraph:
Less than an hour after the attack British troops appeared in Ahmići along with the whole BBC journalist crew. Without any research and looking straight to camera British commander Bryan Watters repeatedly accused Croats for the massacre. An ex British premiere Margaret Thatcher, known to sympathize Croats, canceled her meeting with Croatian war government planned 6 days after this event. Ahmići tragedy was often used in BBC program as an example of Croat - muslim "war" with the agenda of guilt equity between all three sides of the conflict. Bošnjačka televizija broadcasted an interview of a witness that said: "I heard the attackers using English language."
American intelligence magazine EIR (Executive intelligence review) has published an article, 22. September 1995. about the role of MI6 in Ahmići tragedy. The article was written by Umberto Pascali.
...
appears to be attacking the neutrality of British Peakekeeping troops who discovered the massacre.
It also raises the opinion of EIR, hardly a neutral resource for Wikipedia.
I'd like to see that section edited, removed, and the EIR rubbish taken out — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.219.149.231 ( talk) 22:34, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
It doesn't "attack the neutrality" but involvement of British Peacekeeping troops. And the BBC. If any there is no FACTS disputable the section should be brought back to the page. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
141.136.162.107 (
talk)
21:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Ah, point taken, let me elaborate and be a bit more accurate.
I believe that this paragraph suggests, or appears to imply, WITH NO BASIS IN FACT, no references, no historical accuracy, that there were outside agencies involved in the Ahmici Massacre - perhaps that British Troops working for the UNITED NATIONS may have been involved in massacring civilians including women and children///<or that there waqs something underhand in the discovery of the massacre by British troops of the 1st Battalion The Cheshire Regiment, under the command of Lt. Col. Bob Stewart (now Colonel Ret.)
Furthermore I'd say that this article is the only place on the internet taht such rubbish can be found.
Moreover, it reads like an opinion piece, with no references, and therefore does reduce the neutrality of the article
This would, for sure help the neutrality of Wikipedia: naming sources at your will "rubbish". Fascinating: whole article doesn't mention BBC, or Cheshire Regiment even having in mind "the discovery" of the event. Whole article doesn't mention how pointless would it be for Croatians to attack Bosnian people strategically, logically, historically. There is one side that took a good advantage, now publishing these articles. What documents there are about Lt. Col. Bob Stewart (and his previous employment with Karadžić) should definitely brought to the front of this page. For the sake of neutrality. (Mind me for not calling your sources rubbish at my will, for the sake of neutrality.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.164.39.10 ( talk) 15:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ahmići massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC)