This article was nominated for deletion on 10 September 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Telangana Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Telangana (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in May 2021. Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'd propose moving the references to a new column at the end. Also, I'd propose getting away with the awaiting release table break, and just put the {{ Pending film}} and/or a note. Headers in the middle of the table for splitting is advised against. I couldn't find the MOS right away. Perhaps someone could link it? — DaxServer ( talk to me) 10:39, 28 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Since the list is now growing, should a split be considered? And/or should we only include the notable (with articles) shows in the tables? — DaxServer ( talk) 11:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The article can be split but shows don't have to be notable, imv. That restriction is generally imposed for topics where the list can become endless. A quick look at Netflix and Prime Video indciates that even non-notable shows are mentioned. -- Ab207 ( talk) 13:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Yupp, looks good. Since the content without tables is a bit short, maybe we will wait for few more months and could split once the table grows further? Or the article could be expanded, of course. — DaxServer ( talk) 13:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC) reply