Agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan respecting the District of Zanghezour is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to
Armenia and
Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the
project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan respecting the District of Zanghezour is currently a World history
good article nominee. Nominated by
Olympianloquere at 07:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the
good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a
good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the
good article instructions.)
Short description: Agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan during the Armenian–Azerbaijani war (1918–1920)
Article issues
Baberovski is a fringe source,
[1] and that just leaves Balayev which is very partisan. Also, why does the wording POV-push that Armenians were "bringing about a 're-Armenianization'" while the Azeris only "launched a campaign to capture Zangezur"?
Dallavid (
talk)
22:44, 23 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Hi Dallavid, if you had taken the time to check the article history, you’d have seen that it wasn’t me that added the Baberovski and Balayev references to the article
[2]. I tried to remove those citations when first publishing the article (I copied the paragraph they were in from the
Massacres of Azerbaijanis in Armenia in 1917–1921), however, there were some traces of the old citations (SFN templates) left behind which led
User:ActivelyDisinterested to add those references—I’ve since completely removed them. I hope that explanation answers your concern. In regards to your second point, I’m not quite sure what you mean, I simply wrote what reliable sources support. –
Olympianloquere08:17, 24 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Removing citations from an article achieves nothing, if you don't also remove the references in the article text. The references are still in the article, and just create an error here
Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. I did not add these references to the article, I just fixed the error caused by removing the cite that those references linked too. I have no interest in the article or it's subject. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested∆
transmissions∆ °
co-ords°
11:28, 24 December 2022 (UTC)reply