![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is an English-speaking Wikipedia. This title of the book published in English is "Agape and Eros". It is here proposed that name of the article be changed to reflect the English title of the book. The history of the article and talk page would all be saved with such a change. It anyone objects, please make a your case here. Thank you. -- Thomasmeeks ( talk) 18:46, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Each of the above paragraphs is an argument moving title of this article to 'Agape and Eros'.
I'm asking for your comments below in the next week before making a formal request below using the format from WP:RM#CM to move the title to 'Agape and Eros'. Thank you. -- Thomasmeeks ( talk) 00:30, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. ( non-admin closure) — Amakuru ( talk) 10:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Eros and Agape →
Agape and Eros – Per
WP:NCBOOKS#Title translations: "If the book is best known by an English title, use that version of the title." As evidence, see
Google Books title for
https://books.google.com/books/about/Agape_and_Eros.html?id=Nk0JAQAAIAAJ , which uses the book title advocated here. For other arguments to the same end, see the section immediately above this at
Talk:Eros and Agape#Proposal to have title changed to "Agape and Eros", where other comments have been solicited for the past week.
Thomasmeeks (
talk)
20:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Agape and Eros/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The article claims that Nygren's definition of eros is more accurate than Pope Benedict XVI's definition. That claim is both biased and irrelevant to an exposition of Nygren's book. |
Substituted at 18:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)