From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Adore You (Harry Styles song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LOVI33 ( talk · contribs) 19:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Hey Ashleyyoursmile, I'm going to start my review now. LOVI 33 19:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

LOVI33, Thanks! -- Ashley yoursmile! 20:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead

  • Only the recording studios belong in the infobox, so make sure remove Sterling Sound and Eastwest
  • RAK Studios → RAK, per Template:Infobox song
  • London, England → London, UK
  • Remove wikilink for Harry Styles under songwriters, WP:OVERLINK

 Done -- Ashley yoursmile! 07:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Background and composition

 Done everything else. -- Ashley yoursmile! 07:57, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Release and promotion

  • he performed the song on Capital FM's 2019 Jingle Bell Ball → he performed the song at Capital FM's 2019 Jingle Bell Ball

 Done -- Ashley yoursmile! 07:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Critical reception

Commercial performance

  • and number eight on the Wallonia region of Belgium → and number eight in the Wallonia region of Belgium
  • at number 14 on the week of 22 December 2019 → at number 14 in the week of 22 December 2019
  • on the week of 12 January → in the week of 12 January 2020.
  • In its 15th week broke into the top ten at number seven → In its 15th week, it broke into the top ten at number seven
  • un-italicize Hot AC

 Done -- Ashley yoursmile! 07:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Music video

Background

 Done -- Ashley yoursmile! 07:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Synopsis

  • "resting fish face" → "resting fish [faces]"

 Done -- Ashley yoursmile! 07:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Reception

  • No problems found, Great writing!

Credits and personnel

  • No problems found.

Charts

  • Looks Good!

Certifications

  • Looks Good!

Release history

  • Looks Good!

References

Final comments and verdict

  •  On hold for now, this 100% passes all the GA requirements like I filled out above, just some technical fixes, then we can get it to GA in no time! As I said before, amazing writing, no doubt this will be GA. LOVI 33 21:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply
LOVI33, Thank you very much for this review! I have addressed all comments. -- Ashley yoursmile! 08:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Ok Ashleyyoursmile, thats a pass! checkY
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth ( talk05:58, 19 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Improved to Good Article status by Ashleyyoursmile ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC). reply


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: GA since 23 June 2020, interesting enough, Earwig is ok, nominator has less than 5 DYK credits so no need for QPQ. Just a problem regarding ALT1: the article cited a Vogue article rather than the two you provided, I suggest changing that. Corachow ( talk) 14:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Corachow, Thank you so much for the review. I replaced the sources linked to hook ALT1 with the Vogue ref. like you suggested. Does this meet the standard now? Ashley yoursmile! 14:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC) reply
That's great! Ready to go. Corachow ( talk) 15:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC) reply